Custom Search
Questions and Comments


Copyright © 2010  
All rights reserved.
January 5, 2014

The Case of the Missing Recovery

Paul Craig Roberts


Have you seen the economic recovery? I haven’t either. But it is bound to be around
here somewhere, because the National Bureau of Economic Research spotted it in
June 2009, four and one-half years ago.

It is a shy and reclusive recovery, like the “New Economy” and all those promised new
economy jobs. I haven’t seen them either, but we know they are here, somewhere,
because the economists said so.

Congress must have seen all those jobs before they went home for Christmas,
because our representatives let extended unemployment benefits expire for 1.3
million unemployed Americans, who have not yet met up with those new economy
jobs, or even with an old economy job for that matter.

By letting extended unemployment benefits expire, Congress figures that they saved
1.3 million Americans from becoming lifelong bums of the nanny state and living off
the public purse. After all, who do those unemployed Americans think they are? A
bank too big to fail? The military-security complex? Israel?

What the unemployed need to do is to form a lobby organization and make campaign

Just as economists don’t recognize facts that are inconsistent with corporate grants,
career ambitions, and being on the speaking circuit, our representatives don’t
recognize facts inconsistent with campaign contributions.

For example, our representative in the White House tells us that ObamaCare is a
worthy program even though those who are supposed to be helped by it aren’t
because of large deductibles, copays, and Medicaid estate recovery. The cost of this
non-help is a doubling of the policy premiums on those insured Americans who did not
need ObamaCare and the reclassification by employers of workers’ jobs from full-time
to part-time in order to avoid medical insurance costs. All it took was campaign
contributions from the insurance industry to turn a policy that hurts most and helps
none into a worthy program. Worthy, of course, for the insurance companies.

Keep in mind that it is the people who could not afford medical insurance who have to
come up with their part of the premium or pay a penalty. How do people who have no
discretionary income come up with what are to them large sums of money? Are they
going to eat less, drive less, dress less? If so, what happens to people employed in
those industries when demand falls? Apparently, this was too big a thought for the
White House occupant, his economists, and our representatives in Congress.

According to the official wage statistics for 2012
cgi?year=2012 , forty percent of the US work force earned less than $20,000, fifty-
three percent earned less than $30,000, and seventy-three percent earned less than
$50,000. The median wage or salary was $27,519. The amounts are in current dollars
and they are compensation amounts subject to state and federal income taxes and to
Social Security and Medicare payroll taxes. In other words, the take home pay is less.

To put these incomes into some perspective, the poverty threshold for a family of four
in 2013 was $23,550.

In recent years, the only incomes that have been growing in real terms are those few
at the top of the income distribution. Those at the top have benefitted from
“performance bonuses,” often acquired by laying off workers or by replacing US
workers with cheaper foreign labor, and from the rise in stock and bond prices caused
by the Federal Reserve’s policy of quantitative easing. Everyone else has
experienced a decline in real income and wealth.

As only slightly more than one percent of Americans make more than $200,000
annually and less than four-tenths of one percent make $1,000,000 or more annually,
there are not enough people with discretionary income to drive the economy with
consumer spending. When real median family income and real per capita income
ceased to grow and began falling, Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan
substituted a credit expansion to take the place of the missing growth in income.
However, as consumers became loaded with debt, it was no longer possible to expand
consumer spending with credit expansion.

World War II left the US economy the only undamaged industrial and manufacturing
center. Prosperity ensued. But by the 1970s the Keynesian demand management
economic policy had produced stagflation. Reagan’s supply-side policy was able to
give the US economy another 20 years. But the collapse of the Soviet Union brought
an era of jobs offshoring to large Asian economies that formerly were closed to
Western capital. Once corporate executives realized that they could earn multi-million
dollar performance bonuses by moving US jobs abroad and once they were
threatened by Wall Street and shareholder advocates with takeovers if they did not,
American capitalism began giving the US economy to other countries, mainly located
in Asia. As high productivity manufacturing and professional service jobs (such as
software engineering) moved offshore, US incomes stagnated and fell.

As real income growth stagnated, wives entered the work force to compensate.
Children were educated by refinancing the home mortgage and using the equity in the
family home or with student loans that they do not earn enough to repay. Since the
December 2007 downturn, Americans have used up their coping mechanisms. Homes
have been refinanced. IRAs raided. Savings drawn down. Grown children, now adults,
are back home with parents. The falling labor force participation rate signals that the
economy can no longer provide jobs for the workforce. In such a situation, economic
recovery is impossible.

What the Treasury and Federal Reserve have done, with the complicity of the White
House, Congress, economists, and the media, is to focus on rescuing a half dozen
banks “too big to fail.” The consequence of focusing economic policy on saving the
banks is rigged financial markets and massive stock and bond market bubbles. To
protect the dollar’s exchange value from quantitative easing, the price of gold has
been forced down in the paper futures market, with the consequence that physical
gold is shipped to Asia where it is unavailable as a refuge for Americans faced with
currency depreciation.

At a time when most Americans are running out of coping mechanisms, the US faces a
possible financial collapse and a high rate of inflation from dollar depreciation as the
Fed pours out newly created money in an effort to support the rigged financial

It remains to be seen whether the chickens can be kept from coming home to roost for
another year.

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and
associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week,
Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university
appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. His latest
book, The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West is
now available.