Questions and Comments
backfire@ofthisandthat.org

ofthisandthat

Commentary
Copyright © 2010 ofthisandthat.org.  
All rights reserved.
February 5, 2017

DARK MONEY NETWORK TAKING POWER IN U.S. AND U.K.


By George Monbiot

Source:  monbiot.com

It took corporate America a while to warm to Donald Trump. Some of his positions,
especially on trade, horrified business leaders. Many of them favoured Ted Cruz or
Scott Walker. But once he had secured the nomination, the big money began to
recognise an unprecedented opportunity.

Trump was prepared not only to promote the cause of corporations in government,
but to turn government into a kind of corporation, staffed and run by executives and
lobbyists. His incoherence was not a liability but an opening: his agenda could be
shaped. And the dark money network that some American corporations had already
developed was perfectly positioned to shape it.

Dark money is the term used in the US for the undisclosed funding of organisations
involved in political advocacy. Few people would see a tobacco company as a
credible source on public health, or a coal company as a neutral commentator on
climate change. To advance their political interests, such companies must pay others
to speak on their behalf.

Soon after the Second World War, some of America’s richest people began setting up
a network of thinktanks to promote their interests. These purport to offer
dispassionate opinions on public affairs. But they are more like corporate lobbyists,
working on behalf of those who founded and fund them. These are the organisations
now running much of the Trump administration.

We have no hope of understanding what is coming until we understand how the dark
money network operates. The remarkable story of a British member of parliament
provides a unique insight into this network, on both sides of the Atlantic. His name is
Liam Fox. Six years ago, his political career seemed to be over.

The scandal he had caused by mixing his private and official interests, that was highly
embarrassing to David Cameron’s government, had forced him to resign as Secretary
of State for Defence. But today he is back on the front bench, with a crucial and
sensitive portfolio: Secretary of State for International Trade.

In 1997, the year the Conservatives lost office to Tony Blair, Liam Fox, who sits on the
hard right of the parliamentary Conservative party, founded an organisation called
The Atlantic Bridge. Its patron was Margaret Thatcher. On its advisory council sat the
future cabinet ministers Michael Gove, George Osborne, William Hague and Chris
Grayling. Fox, who became a leading campaigner for Brexit, described the mission of
The Atlantic Bridge as “to bring people together who have common interests”. It would
defend these interests from “European integrationists who would like to pull Britain
away from its relationship with the United States”.

The Atlantic Bridge was later registered as a charity. It was part of the UK’s own dark
money network: only after it collapsed did we discover the full story of who had funded
it.

Its main sponsor was the immensely rich Michael Hintze, who worked at Goldman
Sachs before setting up his own hedge fund, CQS. Hintze is one of the Conservative
party’s biggest donors. In 2012, he was revealed as a funder of the Global Warming
Policy Foundation, that casts doubt on the science of climate change. As well as
making cash grants and loans to The Atlantic Bridge, he lent Liam Fox his private jet
to fly to and from Washington.

Another funder was the drug company Pfizer. It paid for a researcher at The Atlantic
Bridge called Gabby Bertin. She went on to become David Cameron’s press
secretary, and now sits in the House of Lords: Cameron gave her a life peerage in his
resignation honours list.

In 2007, a group called the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) set up a
sister organisation, The Atlantic Bridge Project, to run the US arm of Fox’s initiative.
ALEC is perhaps the most controversial of the corporate-funded thinktanks in the US.
It specialises in bringing together corporate lobbyists with state and federal legislators
to develop “model bills”. The legislators and their families enjoy lavish hospitality from
the group, then take the model bills home with them, to promote as if they were their
own initiatives.

ALEC has claimed that over 1000 of its bills are introduced by legislators every year,
and one in five of them becomes law. It has been heavily funded by tobacco
companies, the oil company Exxon, drug companies and Charles and David Koch: the
billionaires who founded the first Tea Party organisations. Pfizer, that funded Gabby
Bertin’s post at The Atlantic Bridge, sits on ALEC’s corporate board. Some of the most
contentious legislation in recent years, such as state bills lowering the minimum wage,
bills granting corporations immunity from prosecution and the “ag-gag” laws,
forbidding people to investigate factory farming practices, were developed by ALEC.

To run the US arm of Atlantic Bridge, ALEC brought in its director of international
relations, Catherine Bray. She is a British woman who had previously worked for the
Conservative member of the European Parliament Richard Ashworth and the UKIP
member Roger Helmer. She has subsequently worked for the man who brought us
Brexit, Daniel Hannan. In 2015, she married Wells Griffith, who became the
battleground states director for Trump’s presidential campaign.

Among the members of The Atlantic Bridge’s US advisory council were the ultra-
conservative senators James Inhofe, Jon Kyl and Jim DeMint. James Inhofe is
reported to have received over $2 million in campaign finance from coal and oil
companies. Both Koch Industries and ExxonMobil have been major donors.
Coincidentally, he has described man-made global warming as “the greatest hoax
ever perpetrated on the American people”.

Jon Kyle, now retired, is currently acting as the “sherpa” guiding Jeff Sessions’s
nomination as Trump’s attorney general through the Senate.

Jim DeMint resigned his seat in the Senate to become president of the Heritage
Foundation, which is probably, after ALEC, the second most controversial thinktank in
America. It was founded with a large grant from Joseph Coors, heir to the Coors
brewing empire, then built up with money from the banking and oil billionaire Richard
Mellon Scaife. Like ALEC, it has been richly funded by the Koch Brothers. Heritage,
under DeMint’s presidency, drove the attempt to ensure that Congress refused to
pass the federal budget, temporarily shutting down the government. Fox’s former
special adviser at the Ministry of Defence, an American called Luke Coffey, now works
for the foundation.

The Heritage Foundation is now at the heart of Trump’s administration. Its board
members, fellows and staff comprise a large part of his transition team. Among them
are Rebekah Mercer, who sits on Trump’s executive committee, Steven Groves and
Jim Carafano (State Department), Curtis Dubay (Treasury) and Ed Meese, Paul
Winfree, Russ Vought and John Gray (Management and Budget). CNN reports that
“no other Washington institution has that kind of footprint in the transition”.

Trump’s extraordinary plan to cut federal spending by $10.5 trillion was drafted by the
Heritage Foundation, which called it a “Blueprint for a New Administration”. Russ
Vought and John Gray, who moved onto Trump’s team from Heritage, are now turning
this blueprint into his first budget.

It will, if passed, inflict devastating cuts on healthcare, social security, legal aid,
financial regulation and environmental protections, eliminate programmes to prevent
violence against women, to defend civil rights and fund the arts, and will privatise the
Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Trump, as you follow this story, begins to look
less like a president and more like an intermediary: implementing an agenda that has
been handed down to him.

In July last year, soon after he became trade secretary, Liam Fox flew to Washington.
One of his first stops was a place he has visited often over the past 15 years: the
office of the Heritage Foundation, where he spoke among others to Jim DeMint. A
freedom of information request reveals that one of the topics raised at the meeting
was the European ban on American chicken washed in chlorine: a ban that producers
hope the UK will lift under a new trade agreement. Afterwards, Fox wrote to DeMint,
looking forward to “working with you as the new UK government develops its trade
policy priorities, including in high value areas that we discussed such as defence.”

How did Fox get to be in this position, after the scandal that brought him down six
years ago? The scandal itself provides a possible clue: it involved a crossing of the
boundaries between public and private interests. The man who ran the UK branch of
The Atlantic Bridge was his friend Adam Werrity, who operated out of Michael Hintze’s
office building. Werrity’s work became entangled with Liam Fox’s official business as
defence secretary. Werritty, who carried a business card naming him as Fox’s adviser
but was never employed by the Ministry of Defence, joined the secretary of state on
numerous ministerial visits overseas, and made frequent visits to Fox’s office.

By the time details of this relationship began to leak, the Charity Commission had
investigated The Atlantic Bridge and determined that its work didn’t look very
charitable. It had to pay back the tax from which it had been exempted (Hintze picked
up the bill). In response, the trustees shut the organisation down. As the story about
Adam Werrity’s unauthorised involvement in the business of government began to
grow, Fox made a number of misleading statements. He was left with no choice but to
resign.

So when Theresa May brought him back into government, and gave him a portfolio
that should, in principle, involve setting clear boundaries between public and private
interests, it was as strong a signal as we might receive about the intentions of her
government.

The trade treaties that Fox is charged with developing set the limits of sovereignty. US
food and environmental standards tend to be lower than ours, and they will become
lower still if Trump gets his way. Any trade treaty we strike will create a common set of
standards for products and services. Trump’s administration will demand that ours are
adjusted downwards, so that US corporations can penetrate our markets without
having to modify their practices. All the cards, following the Brexit vote, are in US
hands: if the UK resists, there will be no treaty. What May needed – even before
Trump became president – was a person prepared to strike such a deal.

As the Financial Times reports, “the election of Donald Trump has transformed the
fortunes of Liam Fox”. He is now “an indispensable member of Theresa May’s front
bench team”. The shadow diplomatic mission he developed through The Atlantic
Bridge plugs him straight into the Trump administration.

Long before Trump won, campaign funding in the US had systematically corrupted the
political system. A new analysis by US political scientists finds an almost perfect linear
relationship, across 32 years, between the money gathered by the two parties for
congressional elections and their share of the vote. But there has also been a shift
over these years: corporate donors have come to dominate this funding.

By tying our fortunes to those of the United States, the government binds us into this
system. This is part of what Brexit is about: European laws protecting the public
interest were portrayed by Conservative Eurosceptics as intolerable intrusions on
corporate freedom. Taking back control from Europe means closer integration with
the US. The transatlantic special relationship is a special relationship between political
and corporate power.

In April 1938, President Franklin Roosevelt sent the US Congress the following
warning. “The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of
private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself.
That, in its essence, is fascism.” It is a warning we would do well to remember.