Copyright © 2010 ofthisandthat.org.
All rights reserved.
May 1, 2011
Donald Trump's lunacy reveals core truth about the Republicans
By Johann Hari
Source: The Independent
Since the election of Barack Obama, the Republican Party has proved that
one of its central intellectual arguments was right all along. It has long
claimed that evolution is a myth believed in only by whiny liberals – and it
turns out it was on to something. Every six months, the party venerates a
new hero, and each time it is somebody further back on the evolutionary
Sarah Palin told cheering rallies that her message to the world was: "We'll
put a boot in your ass, it's the American way!" – but that wasn't enough. So
the party found Michele Bachmann, who said darkly it was an "interesting
coincidence" that swine flu only breaks out under Democratic presidents,
claims the message of The Lion King is "I'm better at what I do because I'm
gay", and argues "there isn't even one study that can be produced that
shows carbon dioxide is a harmful gas."
That wasn't enough. I half-expected the next contender to be a lung-fish
draped in the Stars and Stripes. But it wasn't anything so sophisticated. Enter
stage (far) right Donald Trump, the bewigged billionaire who has filled
America with phallic symbols and plastered his name across more surfaces
than the average Central Asian dictator. CNN's polling suggests he is the
most popular candidate among Republican voters. It's not hard to see why.
Trump is every trend in Republican politics over the past 35 years taken to
its logical conclusion. He is the Republican id, finally entirely unleashed from
all restraint and all reality.
The first trend is towards naked imperialism. On Libya, he says: "I would go in
and take the oil... I would take the oil and stop this baby stuff." On Iraq, he
says: "We stay there, and we take the oil... In the old days, when you have a
war and you win, that nation's yours." It is a view that the world is essentially
America's property, inconveniently inhabited by foreigners squatting over oil-
fields. Trump says America needs to "stop what's going on in the world. The
world is just destroying our country. These other countries are sapping our
strength." The US must have full spectrum dominance. In this respect, he is
simply an honest George W Bush.
The second trend is towards dog-whistle prejudice – pitched just high
enough for frightened white Republicans to hear it. Trump made it a central
issue to suggest that Obama wasn't born in America (and therefore was
occupying the White House illegally), even though this conspiracy theory had
long since been proven to be as credible as the people who claim Paul
McCartney was killed in 1969 and replaced with an imposter. Trump said
nobody "ever comes forward" to say they knew Obama as a child in Hawaii.
When lots of people pointed out they knew Obama as a child, Trump ridiculed
the idea that they could remember that far back. Then he said he'd "heard"
the birth certificate said Obama was Muslim. When it was released saying no
such thing, Trump said: "I'm very proud of myself."
The Republican primary voters heard the message right: the black guy is
foreign. He's not one of us. Trump answered these charges by saying: "I've
always had a great relationship with the blacks."
The third trend is towards raw worship of wealth as an end in itself – and
exempting them from all social responsibility. Trump is wealthy because his
father left him a large business, and since then companies with his name on
them have crashed into bankruptcy four times. In 1990, the Pulitzer Prize-
winning journalist David Cay Johnston studied the Trump accounts and
claimed that while Trump claimed to be worth $1.4bn, he actually owed $600m
more than he owned and you and I were worth more than him. His current
wealth is not known, but he claims he is worth more than $2.7bn.
Johnston says that in fact most of Trump's apparent fortune comes from
"stiffing his creditors" and from government subsidies and favours for his
projects – which followed large donations to the campaigns of both parties,
sometimes in the very same contest. Trump denies these charges and
presents himself as an entrepreneur "of genius".
Yet for the Republican Party, the accumulation of money is proof in itself of
virtue, however it was acquired. The richest 1 per cent pay for the party's
campaigns, and the party in turn serves their interests entirely. The most
glaring example is that they have simply exempted many of the rich from
taxes. Johnston studied four of Trump's recent tax returns, and found he
legally paid no taxes in two of them. In America today, a janitor can pay more
income tax than Donald Trump – and the Republicans regard that not as a
source of shame, but of pride.
How are these tax exemptions for the super-rich paid for? Here's one
example. The Republican budget that just passed through the Senate
slashed funding to help premature babies to survive. The rich riot while the
poor shrivel. Trump offers the ultimate symbol of this: he won't even shake
hands with any ordinary Americans out on the stump, because "you catch all
sorts of things" from them. Yes: the Republican front-runner is a billionaire
who literally won't touch the poor or middle class.
The fourth trend is to insist that any fact inconvenient to your world view
simply doesn't exist, or can be overcome by pure willpower. Soon, the US will
have to extend its debt ceiling – the amount of money the government is
allowed to borrow – or it will default on its debt. Virtually every economist in
the world says this would cause another global economic crash. Trump
snaps back: "What do economists know? Most of them aren't very smart."
Confront the Republicans with any long-term social or economic problem,
and they have one response: it would go away if only we insisted on our
assumptions more aggressively.
This denial of reality runs deep. So Trump says "it's so easy" to deal with
rising oil prices. He says he would call in Opec, the cartel of oil-producing
nations, as if they were contestants on his show The Apprentice, and
declare: "I'm going to look them in the eye and say, 'Fellows, you've had your
fun. Your fun is over.' "
It's the same, he says, with China. He will order them to stop manipulating
their currency. When he was informed that the Chinese had some leverage
over the US, he snapped: "They have some of our debt. Big deal. It's a very
small number relative to the world, ok?" This is what the Republican core
vote wants to be told. The writer Matthew Yglesias calls it "the Green
Lantern Theory of Geopolitics". It's named after the Marvel comics
superhero the Green Lantern, who can only use his superpowers when he
"overcomes fear" and shows confidence – and then he can do anything. This
is Trump's view. The whiny world simply needs to be bullied into submission
by a more assertive America – or the world can be fired and he'll find a better
Trump probably won't become the Republican nominee, but not because
most Republicans reject his premisses. No: it will be because he states
these arguments too crudely for mass public consumption. He takes the
whispered dogmas of the Reagan, Bush and Tea Party years and shrieks
them through a megaphone. The nominee will share similar ideas, but
express them more subtly. In case you think these ideas are marginal to the
party, remember - it has united behind the budget plan of Wisconsin
Representative Paul Ryan. It's simple: it halves taxes on the richest 1
percent and ends all taxes on corporate income, dividends, and inheritance.
It pays for it by slashing spending on food stamps, healthcare for the poor
and the elderly, and basic services. It aims to return the US to the spending
levels of the 1920s – and while Ryan frames it as a response to the deficit, it
would actually increase it according to the independent Center for Budget
and Policy Priorities. Ryan says "the reason I got involved in public service"
was because he read the writings of Ayn Rand, which describe the poor as
"parasites" who must "perish", and are best summarized by the title of one
of her books: 'The Virtue of Selfishness.'
The tragedy is that Obama needs serious opposition – but not from this
direction. In reality, he is funded by similar destructive corporate interests,
and has only been a few notches closer to sanity than these people. But
faced with such overt lunacy, he seems like he is serving the bottom 99 per
cent of Americans much more than he really is.
The Republican Party today isn't even dominated by market fundamentalism.
This is a crude Nietzscheanism, dedicated to exalting the rich as an
overclass and dismissing the rest. So who should be the Republican
nominee? I hear the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse were considering
running – but they are facing primary challenges from the Tea Party for being
way too mild-mannered.