Custom Search
Questions and Comments


Copyright © 2010  
All rights reserved.
The Damage Done to Children

By George Monbiot

Source: The Guardian

Texas is a largely-Christian state that appears to believe in neither forgiveness nor
redemption. Last week the Guardian revealed the extent to which it has criminalised
its children(1). Police now patrol the schools, arresting and charging pupils as young
as six for breaches of discipline.

Among the villainies for which they have been apprehended are throwing paper
aeroplanes, using perfume in class, cheeking the teacher, wearing the wrong clothes
and arriving late for school. A 12 year-old boy with attention deficit disorder was
imprisoned for turning over a desk; six years later, he’s still inside. Children convicted
of these enormities – 300,000 such tickets were issued by Texas police in 2010 –
acquire a criminal record. This makes them ineligible for federal aid at university and
for much subsequent employment.

Yet most of them have committed no recognised crime. As one of the judges who
hears their cases explained to the Guardian, “if any adult did it it’s not going to be a

On the other hand, no charges have been brought against a Texas judge called
William Adams. Last year a video was released which showed him beating the living
daylights out of his daughter with a leather belt(3). The attack was so savage that
when I watched it I nearly threw up. Adams cannot be prosecuted because the beating
took place eight years ago. But even if it had happened yesterday, he might not have
been charged, as he could have claimed that he was disciplining his child(4). In both
cases the law permits people to do things to children that they could not do to adults.

Before we start feeling too superior, we should remember that systematic injustice
towards children is common to many nations. Consider these cases, all from the past
few decades: the theft of babies and forced adoptions in Spain(5); the teenage girls
pressed into slavery into Ireland’s Magdalene laundries(6); the sexual abuse in its
industrial schools(7); similar institutional abuse, also by Catholic priests, in many parts
of the world; buggery and beatings in Welsh children’s homes(8); the British children
told, wrongly, that they were orphans and exported to Australia, Canada and other
Commonwealth countries(9,10); the assaults by staff in privately-run child jails(11). It
seems to me that such abuses have three common characteristics.

The first is that the countries in which they occur appear to possess a sacrificial caste
of children, whose rights can be denied and whose interests can be disregarded with
impunity. The second is that these countries have a powerful resistance towards
confronting and addressing this injustice: discussing it often amounts to a taboo.
(These two traits were chillingly dramatised in Kazuo Ishiguro’s novel Never Let Me
Go). The third is that systematic abuse becomes widely acknowledged only after
determined people – such as Margaret Humphreys (the child migrants) and Alison
Taylor (the Welsh care homes) – spend years trying to force it into the open in the
face of official denial.

So I want to try once more to begin a discussion about an issue we still refuse to
examine: early boarding. It is as British as warm beer, green suburbs and pointless
foreign wars. Despite or because of that we won’t talk about it. Those on the right will
not defend these children, as they will not criticise private schools. Those on the left
won’t defend them, as they see them as privileged and therefore undeserving of
concern. But children’s needs are universal; they know no such distinctions.

The UK Boarding Schools website lists 18 schools which take boarders from the age
of eight, and 38 which take them from the age of seven(12). I expect such places
have improved over the past 40 years; they could scarcely have got worse. Children
are likely to have more contact with home; though one school I phoned last week told
me that some of its pupils still see their parents only in the holidays(13). But the
nature of boarding is only one of the forces that can harm these children. The other is
the fact of boarding.

In a paper published last year in the British Journal of Psychotherapy, Dr Joy
Schaverien identifies a set of symptoms common among early boarders that she calls
Boarding School Syndrome(14). Her research suggests that the act of separation,
regardless of what might follow it, “can cause profound developmental damage”, as
“early rupture with home has a lasting influence on attachment patterns.”

When a child is brought up at home, the family adapts to accomodate it: growing up
involves a constant negotiation between parents and children. But an institution
cannot rebuild itself around one child. Instead, the child must adapt to the system.
Combined with the sudden and then repeated loss of parents, siblings, pets and toys,
this causes the child to shut itself off from the need for intimacy. This can cause major
problems in adulthood: depression, an inability to talk about or understand emotions,
the urge to escape from or to destroy intimate relationships. These symptoms mostly
affect early boarders: those who start when they are older are less likely to be harmed

It should be obvious that this system could also inflict wider damage. A repressed,
traumatised elite, unable to connect emotionally with others, is a danger to society:
look at the men who started the First World War.

Over the past few days, I have phoned the education department, the Boarding
Schools Association and the head teachers of several schools to ask them a simple
question: how did they decide that seven or eight was an appropriate age for children
to start boarding? In every case the answer was the same: they didn’t. This, they all
told me, is just the way it has always been done. No inquiry, no committee, no board,
no ethics council has, as far as they know, ever examined this question. Very young
children are being sent away from home in a complete vacuum of professional advice.
Compare this with the ethical agonising over whether or not children should be taken
into care and you encounter the class prejudice common to all British governments:
the upper classes require no oversight.

So yes, rage against Texas and its monstrosities, and wonder at the cruel,
authoritarian system a nominal democracy can produce. But remember that this is not
the only place in which governments endorse the damage done to children.



2. as above.


4. See the quotes about this towards the bottom of this article:









13. Howells School, Denbigh, by phone, 13th January 2012.

14. Joy Schaverien, May 2011. Boarding School Syndrome: Broken Attachments – A
Hidden Trauma. British Journal of Psychotherapy. Volume 27, Issue 2, pages 138–
155. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-0118.2011.01229.x

The publishers, Wiley, will charge you $42 to read this article, in line with the
disgraceful practices I discuss here:

So if you want a copy, please email me via my website and I’ll send you one.

15. As above.